#Half life 2 sucks full#
#Half life 2 sucks Pc#

So you find gun '2', it is effective at killing enemy 'B' and anything lower than enemy 'B'. Enemy 'B' comes along, the crowbar does not work well against enemy 'B'. Example: You have a crowbar (gun '1'), it takes out enemy 'A' (first enemy encountered) with realtive ease. (you know f(x)=x) Seriously, this game is too fucking linear. I'm not chomping at the bit, but i'm definitely interested? I just can't help but wonder what the rationale behind some of your comments are.Sequel to the most linear shooter ever. Also Half Life 3 not interesting, what kind of notice me senpai bullshit is that? Both games were revolutionary when they came out and I'm not an fps guy at all. Not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, but the bottom line here is give it time, don't just dismiss it based on very limited first impressions. They're not reinventing the wheel gameplay wise, the intent is to create a greater sense of immersion, within a 3d world and motion controls.

#Half life 2 sucks full#

What could you possibly have against that? Yes there are plenty of tech demos but there are also many full fledged games that are well worth your time, The Walking Dead being the latest and many to look forward to this year. If you can get past those issues, then you get a glimpse at what interactive entertainment eventually can become. (by the way those new Panasonic vr glasses are looking quite comfy, though lacking in power) Yes you get sick at first but your eyes will adjust after some time. Yes VR is still clunky and often cumbersome but so are most things in their early stages. Kinda surprised at the comments here.but maybe not? Maybe that's why GB doesn't make VR videos anymore, cause no one will watch something they seem to have made up their mind about? I hope at least those people actually tried, and if they did, for more than 10 minutes?

We need a good VRMMORPG so that we can really get sucked in there in an all consuming way. If you're a video game person who gets really into the immersion factor games offer, VR is definitely worth looking into. I want to go to there.) just like with all the other genres I've found work OK in VR. Now I'm just sitting around waiting for a VR shooter that I want to play (ArmA 4. Once I shot a 'real gun' in farpoint with the Aim controller, that was it. As soon as VR does something sorta right, all flat games in that genre instantly lose all of their appeal to me. If you're a sim fan, plop yourself down in a DCS cockpit, or something like Asetto Corsa, there's no coming back from VR simming. At least as big of a grain as you'd take with my fanboi-ass enthusiasm.Дon't knock it till you've tried a game that actually sits well with you. Take their opinions with a grain of salt. Anytime people say it's all tech demos and motion sickness, likelyhood is that they've hardly played any of the good shit from the past 2 years, and definitely not much from the last year which has been pretty glorious for VR. It's just constantly getting shit on by the press.

#Half life 2 sucks Pc#

I'm happy as a clam with just my PSVR, and all the PC headsets, even the 200dollar ones, are superior to the PSVR for tracking and resolution etc. Don't let anyone put you off VR by claiming that you need the highest priced hardware available. It's almost twice as expensive as its facebook competition, and 5x as expensive as WinMR. 1000 bucks is what you spend if you want the absolute best.

The bar to entry for VR is super low these days, and that's been true for like 2 years+. If it comes to PSVR2, that would be ideal cause that's likely my next VR hardware purchase.ДЄlso, to those who think that it costs a grand to play this game, please don't repeat that as if it's fact, because you can get a Win MR headset for 200 bucks. I already have a PSVR but I would maybe consider getting one of the cheaper PCVR headsets to play this.